In a recent post by the National Review, they claimed, like every other liberal media and government official, that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by 2.86 million votes, but it that really the truth?
Shortly after the election, Gregg Phillips, Founder of VoteStand and JumpVote reported:
“Completed analysis of database of 180 million voter registrations.”
“Number of non-citizen votes exceeds 3 million.”
“Consulting legal team.”
A couple days after Phillips’ post, Infowars reported:
“According to current indications, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by around 630,000 votes, although around 7 million ballots remain uncounted.”
“Virtually all of the votes cast by 3 million illegal immigrants are likely to have been for Hillary Clinton, meaning Trump might have won the popular vote when this number is taken into account.”
“Vote fraud using ballots cast in the name of dead people and illegal alien voters was a huge concern before the election.”
‘On the morning of the election there were 4 million dead people on U.S. voter rolls.”
I wrote several posts in the months prior to the election about liberally run states like California and Oregon, who have passed laws that allow illegal aliens and non-citizens to register to vote simply by applying for a driver’s license or just renewing an existing license. In California, it’s now an automatic process. Whenever anyone obtains a valid state driver’s license or renews an existing license, they automatically are registered to vote. The danger of this type of liberal law allow illegal aliens and foreign nationals to obtain valid state driver’s licenses, thus automatically registering them to vote, even though they are not legally allowed to vote.
I’ve contended that this was the primary motive behind Barack Obama’s illegal changes to federal immigration laws in allowing nearly 20 million illegals to remain in the country without fear of being deported just so many could vote in this year’s election. His administration has even set tens of thousands of illegals with felony convictions free to walk the streets of America and obtain a driver’s license and vote. That’s why on August 9, I posted an article asking ‘Will voter fraud see Hillary elected, just like it elected Obama?’
Also contained in the Nation Review post was the following:
“As you’ve undoubtedly heard by now, Hillary won the national popular vote by 2.86 million votes (48.2% to 46.1%), due entirely to a 4.27 million vote margin of victory in California, which she carried by more than a 30-point margin (61.7% to 31.6%)…”
“Outside California, Trump outdistanced Hillary by 1.41 million votes, 47.8% to 46.6%. As I have noted before, Hillary’s support was so geographically narrow that she won a popular vote majority in only 13 states (plus DC), the fewest of any major-party candidate since Bob Dole, barely half as many as Obama four years ago.”
Allow me to point out that Clinton won the popular vote in Oregon, the other state that allowed illegal aliens to vote, by 192,125 votes over Donald Trump.
If you add up all of the circumstantial evidence, several million illegal votes were cast by non-citizens – most likely by illegal aliens allowed to register to vote in California and Oregon. I have contended all along that this was the real purpose behind Barack Obama’s illegal immigration policies and it appears I’ve been proven right.
I know that there is no way our liberal federal government nor the liberal state governments of California and Oregon, would ever take measures to verify that all of the votes cast in their states were by legal US residents. I doubt if we’ll ever know just how many of those Hillary votes cast in these two liberal states were cast by illegal aliens. If they did, I believe that it would end up proving that Trump indeed the won the popular vote nationwide by a narrow margin and would further justify his claim to the presidency.